1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 4 (1950)
 

CAPO v. C-O TWO FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.

No. C-492-49.

93 F.Supp. 4 (1950)

CAPO et al. v. C-O TWO FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

October 13, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David T. Wilentz, Arthur J. Sills, Perth Amboy, N. J., for plaintiffs.

Markley & Broadhurst, James B. Emory, Jersey City, N. J., for defendant.

SMITH, District Judge.

This is a civil action in which the plaintiffs assert a claim for damages which, it is alleged, were occasioned by the defendant's breach of warranty. The action is before the Court at this time on the motion of the defendant to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to compel the plaintiffs to join certain insurers. The ultimate facts essential to the determination of the question raised by the motion are not disputed.

Facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases