STEINBERG v. HARDY

Civ. No. 2806.

93 F.Supp. 873 (1950)

STEINBERG et al. v. HARDY et al.

United States District Court District Connecticut.

September 27, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Tulin, Hartford, Conn., Abraham Marcus, New York City, for plaintiff.

Wiggin & Dana, by Frank E. Callahan, all of New Haven, Conn., for defendants Hardy and Buckley.

Thompson, Weir & MacDonald, by Curtiss K. Thompson all of New Haven, Conn., for defendants Barium Steel Corp. and Central Iron and Steel Co.


HINCKS, Chief Judge.

This is a derivative stockholders' action which was settled for $100,000 on the eve of trial. Thereafter, I awarded plaintiffs' attorneys $18,000 as compensation for their services and ordered that they be reimbursed for all their expenses. The case is now before the court on request of plaintiffs' counsel for reargument, a request made in the belief that if I had not acted under some inadvertence I would have made a larger allowance. The argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases