PIRKLE v. HALL

32944.

81 Ga. App. 882 (1950)

59 S.E.2d 926

PIRKLE v. HALL et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided June 7, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert J. & Joseph Haas, for plaintiff in error.

Dunaway, Riley & Howard, Neely, Marshall & Greene, W. Neal Baird, contra.


WORRILL, J.

The plaintiff in error, Henry Pirkle, was one of the three defendants named in a petition as amended and as set forth in Brown v. Hall, ante, 874. Error is assigned on the allowance of an amendment which set forth in more detail the invitation alleged in the original petition and which showed that it was for two purposes: (a) "To sample the products of manufacture and to inspect the machinery, equipment and operation of the plant" and (b...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases