ANDERSON v. DOOLITTLE

Docket No. 17508.

97 Cal.App.2d 836 (1950)

218 P.2d 848

ORIEN HAYWOOD ANDERSON, Respondent, v. JAMES A. DOOLITTLE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

May 31, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herman Lewis Bennett for Appellant.

Pacht, Warne, Ross & Bernhard and Rudolph Pacht for Respondent.


DRAPEAU, J.

This is an action to recover treble damages by reason of an alleged usurious transaction. (Cal. Const., art. XX, § 22; Usury Law (Deering's Gen. Laws, 1944, Act 3757, §§ 1-3.) Plaintiff sued out a writ of attachment. Her affidavit in support thereof averred that defendants were indebted to her upon an implied contract made or payable in this state for the direct payment of money. Defendant Doolittle denied the usury and appeals from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases