WEST BLOOMFIELD CO. v. HADDOCK

Docket No. 68, Calendar No. 44,562.

326 Mich. 601 (1950)

40 N.W.2d 738

WEST BLOOMFIELD COMPANY v. HADDOCK.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided January 9, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patterson & Patterson, for plaintiffs.

J.A. Tillson (William A. Ewart, of counsel), for defendants.


NORTH, J.

In this injunction suit the defendants were enjoined from erecting a proposed structure on a parcel of land hereinafter described. From the decree entered the defendants, Dr. Douglass A. Haddock and his wife, Maude R. Haddock, have appealed. In general the controversy centers around defendants' right to continue the construction of a building of which a part is residential and the balance is designed as and for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases