PER CURIAM:
This is the second time this petitioner has had his case, involving his confinement in the Maryland Penitentiary, before this Court on habeas corpus. The first case is to be found in Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A.2d 553.
The claims he now makes are different from those in the first case.
He now contends he was not arraigned, no counsel was assigned to him, and that he did not have time to get counsel.
On application...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
