1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 184 F.2d
  5. 184 F.2d 684 (1950)
 

FRIEND v. GRANAT BROS.

Nos. 12407, 12408.

184 F.2d 684 (1950)

FRIEND et al. v. GRANAT BROS. GRANAT BROS. v. FRIEND et al. BROWN et al. v. GRANAT BROS. GRANAT BROS. v. BROWN et al.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

October 25, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Naylor and Naylor & Lessagne, all of San Francisco, Cal. (John Vaughan Groner, and Fish, Richardson & Neave, all of New York City, of counsel), for Feature Ring Co. et al.

Mellin, Hanscom & Hursh, Oscar A. Mellin, LeRoy Hanscom and Jack E. Hursh, all of San Francisco, Cal., for Granat Bros.

Before HEALY, BONE, and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Granat Bros. has for a number of years advertised and marketed at wholesale and retail a wedding and engagement ring ensemble for which it has registered and used the trade-mark "WedLok." In use its rings are mechanically locked or fastened together. Claiming infringement and unfair competition, it brought suit to enjoin Samuel H. Friend and others from using the trade-mark "Feature Lock" in the advertising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases