PER CURIAM.
This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel for respective parties;
And the Court being of the opinion that there was substantial evidence of negligence on the part of the appellant Weideman as well as on the part of the appellant Hicks, and that the trial Judge was correct in submitting such issue to the jury with respect to both of said appellants;
And no prejudicial error appearing from the record;
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
