1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 229 S.W.2d
  5. 229 S.W.2d 600 (1950)
 

BIG THREE WELD. EQ. CO. v. CRUTCHER, ROLFS, CUMMINGS

No. A-2499.

229 S.W.2d 600 (1950)

BIG THREE WELDING EQUIPMENT CO., Inc., v. CRUTCHER, ROLFS, CUMMINGS, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Rehearing Denied May 31, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry W. Freeman, Houston, for Big Three Welding Equipment Co., Inc.

Andrews, Kurth, Campbell & Bradley, Homer Mabry, Bates, Cartwright & Bates, and Reagan Cartwright, Houston, for Crutcher, Rolfs, Cummings, Inc., and others.

Brian S. Odem, U. S. Atty., W. R. Eckhardt, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, for the United States.

Rex G. Baker, Moody Pearson, Nelson Jones and Frank L. Heard, Jr., Houston, for Humble Pipe Line Co.

SMEDLEY, Justice.

The controversies herein are as to priorities of liens and consequently as to priorities of payment out of a fund deposited with the clerk of the district court by Humble Pipe Line Company as stakeholder. On trial without a jury the district court adjudged that the petitioner, Big Three Welding Equipment Company, Inc., which perfected a garnishment lien, is entitled to priority over all other parties to the suit; that the United States of America...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases