SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. FLORENCE

32758.

81 Ga. App. 1 (1950)

57 S.E.2d 856

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. FLORENCE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided February 17, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neely, Marshall & Greene, Edgar A. Neely Jr., for plaintiff, in error.

William Hall, Douglas Dennis, contra.


WORRILL, J.

1. The first two grounds of special demurrer objected to that portion of the plaintiff's petition relating to the position of the train at the crossing. The defendant complains that certain portions of paragraphs 7 and 8 were so vague and indefinite that the defendant could not tell in what position the train was with reference to the crossing, that is whether it was blocking or only partially blocking the crossing or completely off the crossing. The allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases