MATTER OF 140 RIVERSIDE DRIVE v. MURDOCK


276 A.D. 550 (1950)

In the Matter of 140 Riverside Drive Incorporated et al., Respondents, v. Harris H. Murdock et al., Constituting The Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 28, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel T. Scannell of counsel (Seymour B. Quel with him on the brief; John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel, attorney), for appellants.

Cornelius G. De Loca of counsel (Lawrence R. Eno, with him on the brief), for respondents.

GLENNON, J. P., COHN, CALLAHAN, VAN VOORHIS and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The maintenance of a candy, tobacco and newspaper counter by a hotel for the convenience of its guests is an integral part of the permitted business use, and consequently an accessory use within the meaning of the zoning resolution. Hotels, catering as they do to the needs and wants of transients generally make such facilities available to their guests. These features distinguish a hotel from a rooming,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases