BARROCK v. BARROCK


257 Wis. 565 (1950)

BARROCK, Appellant, vs. BARROCK, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 8, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Rubin & Ruppa, attorneys, and Nathan Ruppa and Norman W. Wegner of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Nathan Ruppa.

John J. Burke and Giles F. Clark, both of Milwaukee, for the respondent.


HUGHES, J.

Plaintiff appeals on the ground that the memorandum decision of September 12th had the effect of a judgment and that upon the expiration of sixty days the trial court lost jurisdiction to amend it.

Sec. 252.10 (1), Stats., provides:

"All judgments and court orders may be reviewed by the court at any time within sixty days from service of notice of entry thereof, but not later than sixty days after the end of the term of entry thereof."<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases