PER CURIAM.
This cause now being before the court upon the original petition for habeas corpus in which the relator represented that he was illegally restrained of his liberty because of the rulings of this court in Brown v. State, 152 Fla. 853, 13 So.2d 458, and similar cases; and it now appearing from the return and from the brief of the Attorney General that he was charged with the violation of F.S.A. § 562.16, as amended in 1945, that is, that he unlawfully...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.