YANISCH v. AMERICAN FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO.


257 Wis. 462 (1950)

YANISCH, Respondent, vs. AMERICAN FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 3, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Stafford & Stafford, attorneys, and Robert F. Pfiffner of counsel, all of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by Mr. Pfiffner.

For the respondent there was a brief by Doar & Knowles, and oral argument by W. T. Doar, Jr., and John Doar, all of New Richmond.


FAIRCHILD, J.

The defendants suggest that the verdict as to questions one, two, and five is contrary to law and contrary to the evidence. They also insist there was error in denying defendants' request to submit a question relating to the plaintiff's management and control of his vehicle. There are other points raised which we do not treat with, because their influence upon the result is of no weight. The defendant Western Automobile Transport, by its agent, was driving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases