CALIFORNIA FRUIT EXCHANGE v. HENRY

No. 10189.

184 F.2d 517 (1950)

CALIFORNIA FRUIT EXCHANGE, Appellant, v. Morris HENRY and Anthony Spracale, Partners, t/a Spracale Fruit Company.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided October 17, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey A. Miller, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Harvey A. Miller, Jr., and Miller & Miller, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

George S. Goldstein, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Michael E. Catanzaro, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before ALBERT LEE STEPHENS, MARIS and STALEY, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the district court, 89 F.Supp. 580, upon an appeal by the defendants from a reparation order of the Secretary of Agriculture under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, 7 U.S.C.A. § 499a et seq. The Secretary of Agriculture had made a reparation award of $2,119.40 with interest representing the plaintiff's damages resulting from the rejection by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases