CAMPO v. SCOFIELD


276 A.D. 413 (1950)

Antonio Campo, Respondent, v. Curtiss Scofield et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

March 8, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Ryan for appellants.

Albert J. Waterman for respondent.

All concur. Present — TAYLOR, P. J., McCURN, LOVE, VAUGHAN and KIMBALL, JJ.


McCURN, J.

This appeal is from an order denying defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 5).

The complaint as supplemented by the amended bill of particulars alleges that the defendants manufactured and sold to one Henry Benthin a so-called...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases