Per Curiam.
Four specific charges of professional misconduct were set forth against respondent. The first and fourth respectively grew out of complaints of gross neglect of the interests of two clients. The second and third charges arose by virtue of claims of abuse of process by respondent. Extended hearings upon the charges were held by the Official Referee designated by this court to take testimony. His report to the court contains the following: "It is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
