WITENBERG v. SYLVIA

No. 31236.

35 Wn.2d 626 (1950)

214 P.2d 690

B.J. WITENBERG, Respondent, v. C.E. SYLVIA, Appellant, HAROLD A. DAHL, Defendant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

February 6, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brightman, Roberts & Holm, for appellant.

Eisenhower, Hunter & Ramsdell, for respondent.


HILL, J.

This is an action by one claiming to be a holder in due course, to recover the amount of a check from the maker and the payee who had endorsed it, payment having been stopped thereon. The payee defaulted and the maker contended that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course. The trial court found that the plaintiff was a holder in due course and entered judgment against the maker and the payee. The maker appeals.

The facts, as found by the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases