KASKEL & SONS v. FID. & DEPOSIT CO.


277 A.D. 366 (1950)

Paul Kaskel & Sons, Inc., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 31, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart Maurice of counsel (Charles R. McNamee and Robert Brooks White with him on the brief; Maurice & McNamee, attorneys), for appellant.

Norman Winer of counsel (Nathan, Mannheimer, Asche & Winer, attorneys), for respondent.

PECK, P. J., GLENNON, CALLAHAN and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur.


SHIENTAG, J.

The question involved on this appeal turns on the construction of a short Statute of Limitations clause in an insurance policy. Defendant has appealed from an order denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action on the policy was not timely brought. The action was commenced on November 10, 1949, on an employees' fidelity policy issued by defendant in the amount of $10,000 for the period from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases