FROSTIDRINK v. SUPERVEND CORPORATION

Civ. No. 3814.

89 F.Supp. 550 (1950)

FROSTIDRINK, Inc. v. SUPERVEND CORPORATION et al.

United States District Court N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.

March 11, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Locke, Locke & Purnell and James J. Laney, Dallas, Texas, Morgan, Finnegan & Durham, New York City, for plaintiff.

Rice, Waitz & Rice, San Antonio, Texas, Saner, Jack & Salinger, Dallas, Texas, Thomas E. Scofield, Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.


ATWELL, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff sues for the infringement of the Bowman patent under which it is assignee, of a soft drink dispensing entity.

The defendants deny infringement and file a cross-action alleging the infringement of a block system of refrigerating the elements of the drink before dispensation to the customer.

The plaintiff moves to dismiss the cross-action, or, to grant separate trials.

Rule 13, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases