MATTER OF BROOKSIDE MILLS (RAYBROOK TEXTILE CORP.)


276 A.D. 357 (1950)

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Brookside Mills, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Raybrook Textile Corporation et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 31, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin M. Otterbourg of counsel (Aaron Rosen and Frederic P. Houston with him on the brief; Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, attorneys), for appellants.

Milton Kunen of counsel (Bernard Soman with him on the brief; Kaye, Scholer, Fierman & Hays, attorneys), for respondents.

PECK, P. J., GLENNON and DORE, JJ., concur with VAN VOORHIS, J.; SHIENTAG, J., dissents in part in opinion.


VAN VOORHIS, J.

Raybrook Textile Corporation (hereinafter described as "Raybrook") and Nathan Sheinman served written notice dated July 22, 1949, upon Brookside Mills, Inc. (hereinafter described as Brookside), Julius A. Krug and Thomas Epstein of "Intention to Arbitrate" three numbered questions stated to have arisen under the provisions of a contract dated April 16, 1948. In order to understand what is sought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases