BURKLE v. SUPERFLOW MFG. CO.


137 Conn. 488 (1950)

ROBERT N. BURKLE ET AL. v. SUPERFLOW MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 28, 1950.

Reargued January 9, 1951.

Opinion amended February 2, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfonse C. Fasano and John Maresca, for the appellant-appellee (named defendant).

Arthur W. Chambers, Jr., and Gordon P. Chambers, with whom, on the brief, were Thomas A. Grimes and Martin M. Merriam, for the appellants-appellees (plaintiffs.)

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and COMLEY, JS.


COMLEY, J.

The finding, which is not subject to any material correction, discloses these facts: On or about February 1, 1946, the named defendant, hereinafter called the defendant, operated a machine shop in which it manufactured a line of plumbing supplies such as elbows, T's, bushings, lock nuts and couplings. It machined these parts from castings which it obtained from various foundries. In addition to these items, it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases