EXTROM v. TOMAHAWK


257 Wis. 348 (1950)

EXTROM, Appellant, vs. CITY OF TOMAHAWK, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 30, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank E. Hebert of Tomahawk, for the appellant.

Charles F. Jensen of Tomahawk, for the respondent.


HUGHES, J.

Appellant contends that the city is without jurisdiction to levy a special assessment because the work had been done before any attempted assessment was made.

We are of the opinion that this question has been answered adversely to appellant in Bekkedal v. Viroqua (1924), 183 Wis. 176, 197, 198, 196 N. W. 879, 197 N. W. 707. In that case it was held the tax was invalid because the provisions of ch. 62, Stats., required that the grade of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases