TULSA CITY LINES v. HOWELL

No. 33679.

202 Okla. 394 (1950)

214 P.2d 255

TULSA CITY LINES, Inc., et al. v. HOWELL.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

January 31, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Truman B. Rucker and William N. Randolph, both of Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

Paul O. Simms, of Vinita, and Leslie Webb, of Tulsa, for defendant in error.


JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries. The verdict of the jury signed by only nine of the twelve jurors was rendered for defendants. The plaintiff's motion for a new trial was sustained, and defendants appeal.

The parties herein will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The motion filed by plaintiff asking for a new trial set up the following grounds: (1) that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence;...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases