BLAYLOCK v. WARE

32972, 32973, 32998, 32999.

81 Ga. App. 498 (1950)

59 S.E.2d 274

BLAYLOCK v. WARE (two cases); and vice versa.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 2, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. H. Porter, Matthews, Owens & Maddox, for plaintiff in error.

Gleason & Painter, contra.


TOWNSEND, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. All persons who are interested in sustaining or reversing the judgment of the trial court are necessary parties on appeal, and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions. Greeson v. Taylor, 160 Ga. 392 (128 S. E. 177). However, where in a suit against two codefendants, verdict and judgment have been entered against them jointly, and one of such codefendants makes a motion for a new trial which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases