1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 188 Or.
  5. 188 Or. 389 (1950)
 

MITCHELL v. OR., WN., CREDIT & COLL. BUR.

188 Or. 389 (1950)

215 P.2d 917

MITCHELL v. OREGON, WASHINGTON CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., A CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 14, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorothy M. Martindale and Sidney I. Lezak argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Lenske, Spiegel, Spiegel & Martindale, all of Portland.

Butler, Jack, Beckett & Holman, of Oregon City, on brief for respondent.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, BELT, ROSSMAN, and BAILEY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

BAILEY, J.

The question presented on this appeal is whether the District Court of Clackamas County, Oregon, exceeded its jurisdiction when it set aside, without motion or hearing, a judgment in favor of defendant and entered one in favor of plaintiff.

Briefly, the facts are: Oregon, Washington Credit & Collection Bureau, Inc., instituted an action in the District Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Clackamas against Burt Mitchell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases