WISCONSIN TELEPHONE CO. v. MATSON


256 Wis. 304 (1950)

WISCONSIN TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. MATSON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 7, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Slocumb & Bundy of Menomonie, and oral argument by R. E. Bundy and Ira O. Slocumb.

For the respondent there was a brief by Stafford & Stafford, attorneys, and R.F. Pfiffner of counsel, all of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by Mr. Pfiffner.


BROWN, J.

The issues for our consideration are primarily these: Does the finding of causal negligence on the part of Nielson rest on mere speculation? Is Matson responsible to third parties for the results of such negligence? Should there have been a question in the special verdict on plaintiff's contributory negligence?

There was no witness at the trial who saw a collision between Matson's truck and the plaintiff's pole, and Matson submits that the jury's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases