SKELLY OIL CO. v. PETERSON


257 Wis. 300 (1950)

SKELLY OIL COMPANY, Appellant, vs. PETERSON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 30, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Benson, Butchart, Haley & Benson of Racine, and oral argument by Donald A. Butchart.

For the respondent there was a brief by Heft, Burgess & Brown of Racine, and oral argument by Carroll R. Heft and John R. Brown.


BROADFOOT, J.

The plaintiff contends that the trial court erroneously assumed that the use of the unexplained word "deposit" in the distributor agreements required the return of the money deposited to the distributor; that the use of the word "deposit" requires an expression of the disposition to be made of the money deposited; that the absence of such expression makes the word ambiguous and the agreement incomplete; therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases