PARIS v. PARIS

17237, 17238.

207 Ga. 341 (1950)

61 S.E.2d 491

PARIS v. PARIS, administratrix, et al.; et vice versa.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

October 11, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ingram & Tull, for plaintiff in error.

J. L. Davis, contra.


ATKINSON, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. Special grounds 1, 2, and 4 of the amended motion for new trial complain that the court erred in permitting Mr. and Mrs. McPhail to testify regarding statements made by the father that the papers were delivered to the defendant for safekeeping, and not as an outright gift to him, and in charging that the evidence was admitted for a limited purpose.

"The delivery of personal property by a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases