1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 61 S.E.2d
  5. 61 S.E.2d 443 (1950)
 

BOSTIC v. BLANTON

No. 163.

61 S.E.2d 443 (1950)

232 N.C. 441

BOSTIC et al. v. BLANTON et ux.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamrick & Jones, Rutherfordton, for plaintiff appellees.

Oscar J. Mooneyham, Forest City, and J. S. Dockery, Rutherfordton, for defendant appellants.

BARNHILL, Justice.

The decisive question here involved is this: What is the true dividing line between the property of the plaintiffs and the property of the defendants?

It is apparent from the judgment entered the court below concluded that this dividing line as now constituted begins at a stake in the Young line 20 feet south 20 degrees west of the point of intersection of the Young line and the southern line of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases