ROBERTSON v. NAT KAISER INVT. CO.

33151.

82 Ga. App. 416 (1950)

61 S.E.2d 298

ROBERTSON v. NAT KAISER INVESTMENT CO. et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied October 6, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, Sidney Haskins, for plaintiff.

B. Hugh Burgess, James K. Rankin. J. Winston Huff, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, for defendants.


FELTON, J.

Paragraph 6 of the plaintiff's petition alleges that the grating over which she tripped was "constructed by or at the direction of or for the benefit of" the Nat Kaiser Investment Company. Pleadings in the disjunctive and alternative are construed most strongly against the pleader (Doyal v. Russell, 183 Ga. 518, 189 S. E. 32), and in applying such principle to the above pleading it merely alleges that the grating was constructed for the benefit of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases