CARHAL FACTORS, INC. v. SALKIND


5 N.J. 485 (1950)

76 A.2d 252

CARHAL FACTORS, INC., ASSIGNEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEON SALKIND, ANNE SALKIND, MAX MUEHLFRIEDEL, HILDEGARDE MUEHLFRIEDEL, HAROLD BAUM AND MARION BAUM, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, AS CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS LEADING EMBROIDERY COMPANY AND LEADING HANDKERCHIEF CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 6, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Bannon argued the cause for respondent. Mr. Charles J. Milton on the brief (Messrs. Milton, McNulty & Augelli, attorneys).

Mr. Sydney I. Turtz argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Theodore Cohen, attorney).


The opinion of the court was delivered by CASE, J.

The appeal (R.S. 2:40-25) was to the Appellate Division from a money judgment in the amount of $6,451.42 entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, Hudson County, on an award by arbitrators, and is certified to us on our own motion. Plaintiff, Carhal Factors, Inc., brought an action at law under a complaint containing four counts of which the first and second were against Leon Salkind, Anne Salkind, Max Muehlfriedel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases