1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 137 Conn.
  5. 137 Conn. 353 (1950)
 

ESSAM v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.

137 Conn. 353 (1950)

MAE E. ESSAM, ADMINISTRATRIX (ESTATE OF FRANK ESSAM) v. THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY FRANK OLIVER v. THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 19, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. O'Sullivan, with whom, on the brief, was Edwin H. Hall, for the appellant (named defendant).

Charles V. James, for the appellee (plaintiff Essam), and William J. Willetts, with whom, on the brief, was George C. Morgan, for the appellee (plaintiff Oliver).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and COMLEY, JS.

INGLIS, J.

These cases arose out of a collision between a small truck and a railroad train at a grade crossing.

The plaintiff's claims of proof may be summarized as follows: Broadway Extension was a highway in the town of Stonington which extended southerly from the Boston Post Road through land owned by, and surrounding the Mystic passenger and freight stations of, the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases