1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 94 F.Supp.
  5. 94 F.Supp. 377 (1950)
 

APPLICATION OF ROGOFF

Misc. No. 113.

94 F.Supp. 377 (1950)

Application of ROGOFF.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

Rehearing Denied February 13, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Szabad and Blum & Jolles, all of New York City, Hugh J. McMenamin, and O'Malley, Harris, Harris & Warren, all of Scranton, Pa., for petitioner.

Marshall M. Holcombe and Curtis, Morris & Safford, all of New York City, George H. Hafer, Hull, Leiby & Metzger, all of Harrisburg, Pa., for defendant.

Rehearing Denied February 13, 1951. See 95 F.Supp. 467.

WATSON, Chief Judge.

The application came to be heard on motion of petitioner for an order compelling respondents, William S. Watts and Franklin H. Wells to answer certain questions propounded to them in depositions being taken in Interference No. 83,667, now pending in the United States Patent Office.

The interference proceeding was initiated by the United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases