STATE, EX REL. CITY OF CINCINNATI v. FLICK.

No. 32094.

153 Ohio St. 294 (1950)

THE STATE, EX REL. CITY OF CINCINNATI, v. FLICK, AUD.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 29, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry M. Bruestle, city solicitor, and Mr. James W. Farrell, Jr., for relator.

Mr. Ed F. Alexander, Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey and Mr. Robert F. Denison, for respondent.


MATTHIAS, J.

The determination of the question presented by the demurrer requires this court to construe Section 26, General Code, and determine its applicability to a proceeding for the issuance of bonds, pursuant to Sections 2293-19 to 2293-23, inclusive, General Code.

The particular question presented relates to the amendment of Section 2293-23, General Code, effective October 25, 1949, altering the vote requirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases