CARLSON v. STEINER


189 Or. 255 (1950)

220 P.2d 100

CARLSON v. STEINER

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 13, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Austin Dunn, of Baker, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Dunn & Jackson, of Baker.

Donald Verne McCallum, of Baker, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before LUSK, and BRAND, ROSSMAN and LATOURETTE, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

BRAND, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff as lessee against the defendant lessor to recover damages on account of the failure of the defendant to furnish hot water and heat as required by the terms of the lease. The case was tried by the court without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals and presents three assignments of error as follows: (1) The court erred in failing to allow the defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases