UNION v. MAZUR

No. 3944.

96 N.H. 347 (1950)

JOURNEYMEN BARBERS &c. UNION v. FRANK A. MAZUR.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

November 17, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Broderick, for the plaintiff.

Sheehan, Phinney & Bass, for the defendant.


BLANDIN, J.

The main question here is whether the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is valid, or as the defendant claims is void for lack of consideration. We believe that the agreement is valid. Squarely in point appears the case of Henderson v. Ugalde, 61 Ariz. 221, where a barbershop proprietor claimed that a contract with a barbers' union similar in the main to the one before us lacked consideration and was unenforceable. The court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases