HOOD v. STATE

No. A-11069.

90 Okla. Cr. 340 (1950)

213 P.2d 883

HOOD v. STATE.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

January 18, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Leslie, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.


POWELL, J.

Homer Gafford and Jacqueline Hood were charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with possession of nine pints of tax-paid whisky. They filed a motion to suppress, with was overruled, counsel then filed a motion for severance, praying that the defendants be tried separately, which was overruled, and thereafter defendants were tried before a jury, and neither testified. At the close of the state's case, each defendant demurred to the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases