1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 186 F.2d
  5. 186 F.2d 230 (1950)
 

VAPOR BLAST MFG. CO. v. PANGBORN CORPORATION

No. 6175.

186 F.2d 230 (1950)

VAPOR BLAST MFG. CO. et al. v. PANGBORN CORPORATION.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided December 30, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Kemp Bartlett, Jr., Baltimore, Md., and Howard A. Hartman, Chicago, Ill. (S. L. Wheeler and H. William Ihrig, Milwaukee, Wis., on brief), for appellants.

Arthur G. Connolly, Wilmington, Del. (Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Joseph France and Stuart S. Janney, Jr., all of Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, Vapor Blast Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Vapor) and A. H. Eppler, instituted a civil action in the United States District Court of the District of Maryland, against the Pangborn Corporation (hereinafter called Pangborn), alleging infringement by Pangborn of the Eppler patent, No. 2,462,480. Only claims 15 and 21 of the patent are here in suit. The District Judge concluded:

"Summarizing our conclusions they are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases