FARR CO. v. GRATIOT

Civ. No. 9759.

92 F.Supp. 320 (1950)

FARR CO. v. GRATIOT et al.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

July 13, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyon & Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Overton, Lyman, Plumb, Prince & Vermille, Harris, Kiech, Foster & Harris and Ward Foster, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.


HALL, District Judge.

The defendant, Air Maze Corporation, is a Delaware Corporation. It has filed a motion to dismiss and to quash service of summons for want of jurisdiction and improper venue. While there is some dispute as to the extent of the agency and activities of the defendant Gratiot, who held himself out as "factory representative" of the defendant corporation, it is conceded by the corporate defendant that his activities were more than that of a mere solicitor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases