HIRSCH v. PHILY


4 N.J. 408 (1950)

73 A.2d 173

SAMUEL HIRSCH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AUGUST PHILY, MURRAY WHITE AND SUPERTEX DYEING & FINISHING CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND DOMINICK SCIALLA, DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 8, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Martin Kimmel argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Colombo Cammarano, attorney).


The opinion of the court was delivered by VANDERBILT, C.J.

The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court from a judgment of the Chancery Division of that court dismissing his complaint and we have certified the appeal here on our own motion.

The plaintiff, who is in the business of discounting accounts receivable, advanced to the Artex Dyeing & Finishing Co., Inc., over a period of five years various sums for which Artex gave him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases