KRUMHOLZ v. RUSAK

No. 35,022.

230 Minn. 178 (1950)

PHILIP J. KRUMHOLZ AND ANOTHER, d.b.a. THE KRUMHOLZ COMPANY, v. GLADES RUSAK.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 3, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Levine & Levine, for appellant.

E.T. Haugland and Ervin & Lundquist, for respondents.


LORING, CHIEF JUSTICE.

Action for damages for the violation of an alleged contract. The jury returned a verdict of $870 in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from the order denying her alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. We consider only the portion of the order denying a new trial, since defendant was not entitled to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because of her failure to make a motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases