1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 6 N.J.
  5. 6 N.J. Super. 391 (1950)
 

CITY OF CLIFTON v. CRESTHAVEN CEMETERY ASS'N

6 N.J. Super. 391 (1950)

71 A.2d 655

CITY OF CLIFTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, AND ERNEST KURZROK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CRESTHAVEN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 1, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank W. Shershin argued the cause for the complainant-respondent (Mr. John G. Dluhy, attorney).

Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, attorney for the State of New Jersey.

Mr. Ernest Kurzrok, pro se, argued the cause.

Mr. Samuel I. Kessler argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Kessler & Kessler, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, McGEEHAN and EASTWOOD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The decree of dismissal, which is the subject of this appeal, was entered by mutual consent of all of the parties. Several consent decrees in other pending actions were also entered. Their purpose was to terminate finally and conclusively all differences theretofore existing between the parties.

Since 1931, there has been litigation in our courts affecting defendant's cemetery and its operation. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases