1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 195 Md.
  5. 195 Md. 200 (1950)
 

PROCTOR v. BROOKHART

[No. 170, October Term, 1949.]

195 Md. 200 (1950)

72 A.2d 682

PROCTOR ET UX. v. BROOKHART ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 14, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Troth Gross and J. Cookman Boyd, Jr., with whom were Stewart O. Day and Tydings, Sauerwein, Benson & Boyd on the brief, for the appellants.

Edward D. Higinbothom and A. Freeborn Brown, III, with whom were Jacobs & Cameron on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before MARBURY, C.J., COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.

GRASON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents for review the correctness of the decree filed by the Chancellor below, in which he sustained a demurrer to the bill of complaint, and dismissed the bill.

William W. Proctor and Dorothy P. Proctor, his wife, reside at Cardiff, Harford County, Maryland, and are taxpayers in that County, and of the State of Maryland. They sued George A. Brookhart, W. Leroy McMaster,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases