1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 188 Or.
  5. 188 Or. 205 (1950)
 

HOWARD v. KLAMATH COUNTY

188 Or. 205 (1950)

215 P.2d 362

HOWARD v. KLAMATH COUNTY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 21, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Maxwell, of Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Farrens & Maxwell, of Klamath Falls.

William Ganong, of Klamath Falls argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Clarence Humble, District Attorney of Klamath County, and Ganong & Ganong, all of Klamath Falls.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, ROSSMAN, BAILEY, HAY and PAGE, Justices.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

BRAND, J.

The action is brought pursuant to the provisions of O.C.L.A., § 87-328 as amended by Oregon Laws 1945, ch. 124, which provides as follows:

"In any county having less than 45,000 inhabitants county surveyors shall be allowed $15 per day each for their services while actually and necessarily engaged in performing the duties of their offices and they shall be allowed for traveling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases