1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 5 N.J.
  5. 5 N.J. 386 (1950)
 

KRAMER v. R.M. HOLLINGSHEAD CORP.

5 N.J. 386 (1950)

75 A.2d 861

SAMUEL KRAMER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. R.M. HOLLINGSHEAD CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 16, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S.P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys).

Mr. William Lipkin argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Lipkin, Neutze & Lipkin, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by ACKERSON, J.

The dispositive question presented by this appeal is the applicability of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to the following circumstances appearing in an agreed statement of facts in lieu of record. Rule 1:2-22.

Plaintiff sued the defendant, manufacturer of a solvent known as "Motor-Tune-Up," in the Camden County District Court to recover for damage to the engine of his automobile resulting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases