NEUMANN v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


257 Wis. 120 (1950)

NEUMANN, Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 2, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Dougherty, Arnold & Waters and Clarence J. Bullock, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the respondents Schlitz Brewing Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company there was a brief by Otjen & Otjen of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Carl Neprud Otjen.


FAIRCHILD, J.

The plaintiff is an unestranged surviving parent residing in the state of Wisconsin and is entitled to receive the death benefit provided by statute for "partial dependency." The evidence referred to in this opinion and in the statement of facts shows that the sister of deceased and her husband, the purchasers of the homestead, together with their own daughter, and the mother, and the deceased lived in a community relation. There were contributions toward...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases