HANNAN v. ADMINISTRATOR


137 Conn. 240 (1950)

FRANK E. HANNAN v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT JOHN C. MASCO v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided August 15, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Silverstone, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was William L. Hadden, attorney general, for the appellant (defendant).

James F. Rosen, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN and COMLEY, JS.


BALDWIN, J.

These two appeals were argued together because they present facts substantially alike and raise the same question of law. The issue determinative of the appeals is whether the plaintiffs are eligible for benefits under the Connecticut Unemployment Compensation Act for such periods of time as they were receiving subsistence allowances under the federal Servicemen's Readjustment Act.

The plaintiff Hannan was employed in Bridgeport until separated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases