HARTLIEB v. CARR

No. 432.

94 F.Supp. 279 (1950)

HARTLIEB v. CARR et al.

United States District Court E. D. Kentucky, Covington.

January 13, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Schaengold, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Sawyer A. Smith, Covington, Ky., for defendants.


SWINFORD, District Judge.

It is continually argued in defendants' brief that this statute, KRS 372.040, is solely for the purpose of deterring gambling. There is nothing in the statute that says that, nor is it proper for this Court to assume to legislate or charge the legislative branch of the government with an interpretation which is not clearly evidenced in the legislation. The statute is meant to protect the homes of those who cannot afford to be enticed into...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases