1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 57 S.E.2d
  5. 57 S.E.2d 315 (1950)
 

POWELL v. INGRAM

No. 751.

57 S.E.2d 315 (1950)

231 N.C. 427

POWELL v. INGRAM et al. STANCELL v. INGRAM et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Manning and Egbert L. Haywood, Durham, for plaintiffs, appellants.

Spears & Hall, Durham, for defendant, John T. Ingram, Jr., appellee.

T. Lacy Williams, Raleigh, and Fuller, Reade, Umstead & Fuller, Durham, for defendant, Bernard Carroll, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the record and case on appeal leaves us with the firm conviction that the trial in the court below conformed to all applicable legal principles. As no error in law appears, the verdict and judgment must be upheld. The question of the liability of Sanders to the plaintiffs was not at issue on the trial, and in consequence the judgment does not preclude the plaintiffs from suing Sanders in case they desire to do so.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases